In an effort to improve my bowling, I have spent the majority of the summer season trying a “new” technique that was shown to me by someone that I highly respect as a bowling coach. After he showed me what to do, the very next day I shot an effortless 300 game. I might also add – that was the whole point; to get a more effortless “traditional” style approach to my “swing”…and release technique.
Well, as many of my friends and teammates will tell you; my bowling has gone completely downhill this summer. I am barely averaging 200 on easy “house-shots”, and totally awful on the PBA patterns.
I say all of this because I got so frustrated tonight during the PBA league (153, 156, 172, 180) that after league, I decided to get a pair of lanes that I had not bowled on, and decided to see what my bowling would be like if I just went BACK to the way I use to bowl. I then shot games 217, 223, 205, and 197...and it felt “good” again. Now, I know the pattern had been “broken-down”, but the thing that was most noticeable was my swing and the ball release (using the way I normally bowl)…”FREE”…as my friend Monte told me.
Now my question is, “Should I just go back to what I know works?” I mean, I have watched local great bowlers like Tim Sprattling, Isom Hawes, Curtis Wilson, Steve Vance (2-hands), Matt Burden, and Ike Reese…and there is NOTHING “traditional” about the way they swing and release a bowling ball… yet it works for THEM.
Even when watching PBA Bowlers Jason Belmonte, Rhino Page, and even The King of Bowling – Wes Mallott… they have a style and way of bowling that (to my eyes) seems uniquely them…not the academic-textbook approach to bowling.
BTW – my average has went from 160 to 214 in only 3 years…but now I am struggling to shoot above 195 on house shots with the new technique attempt.
I look forward to any help and opinions about this….
Thanks,
Chase
Tags:
Share
-
▶ Reply to This